Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jurabek Labaratories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, because the only editor who has added content here blanked the page. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jurabek Labaratories

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Identical article (see original version) by same SPA has twice previously been deleted as a copyright violation. Somehow, what applied the last two times didn't this time.

Following the admin's lead, I removed the copyright violations individually—which left virtually nothing. No sources were given, and the only mentions of this company I found (outside of their own site) were to tangential press releases (example).

The subject's sole bid for notability is the claim that it's "one of the largest medicine manufacturer and retailer headquartered in Tashkent, Uzbekistan." While Tashkent is a large city, it isn't known for its manufacturing prowess or its pharmaceutical/healthcare R&D sector. Consequently, "one of the largest" could mean anything at all—assuming that it's even true. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 04:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shortly after this AFD was created, the original editor blanked the page. Should this be changed to a {{db-g7}}? Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article is worth having, all this nominating for deletion has become harrassment. I see now someone has removed the references section as well. The company is a prominent company in its country. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So if an editor creates an article which is then deleted as a copyvio, and the editor then re-creates an exact duplicate of the article, it shouldn't be put up for deletion as that would be harassment? Interesting POV, but not one I agree with. And if you have sources that say that this is a prominent company in Uzbekistan, please consider adding them to the article! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.