Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jump to the Jam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hillsong Music Australia. Opinions are all over the map, but a delete and redirect seems to be the best solution in the middle of consensus. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 02:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jump to the Jam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of independent significant coverage. WWGB (talk) 01:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On 19 June 2014 the nominator PRODed some 50+ Hillsong-related articles see here. From 21 June I noticed this list and that some 10+ of these PRODs were charting albums at either ARIA or Billboard. I have gone through more of the 50+ list and added sources where possible and dePRODed any that I felt had a reliable source for their existence. I was hoping to get time to supply further sources to attempt to establish notability. With so many articles to research this is not necessarily achievable in a short time-frame. The nominator has sent most of the dePRODed articles straight to AfD. I ask for time/assistance in actually searching for sources to support the articles' notability.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak keep~~ I was able to find a review of the album, there might be more out there.--¿3family6 _contribs 19:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Keep should only happen with three or more (multiple) sources. This presently only has one. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Multiple I'd say is more than one. Agreed that it needs more than one significant mention. Hence my hesitancy to give it a full "keep" vote. But I'm not convinced that there is nothing else written about this album. I haven't done a site search of all the sources on WP:CCM/S, and there could be offline references.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Traditionally "multiple" means three or more in AfDs I've been a part of. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Well, I don't always go by tradition, on or off-Wiki.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Weak delete I can't find anything else after searching most of the relevant sources on WP:CCM/S. On the cusp of notability, but not quite.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Good luck finding an online source for a review or any mention of notoriety for an album released 20 years ago during the infancy of the Internet (particularly for an Australian Christian release). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.6.55.67 (talk) 09:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC) — 58.6.55.67 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

They are correct though. There won't be much online about this album, while there might be much more in print. But in that case, someone with access to print mentions can recreate the article.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 01:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & redirect to Hillsong Music Australia. Like most of the Hillsong Music articles that were created, this one fails both WP:GNG and NALBUM. --Bejnar (talk) 06:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.