Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubair Bin Iqbal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jubair Bin Iqbal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical article about an amateur photographer. No signs of any notability, the claimed awards do not seem to be at all major. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 06:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. May qualify WP:CSD#A7. It is clearly self-promoting article. There we can find thousands of photographers like Jubair in Bangladesh, each having own some I don't know what it means kind of award and many of them feel fake "celebrity" status! None of them are notable enough to be on Wikipedia. – nafSadh did say 16:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO and per nafSadh . Not clear why this particular photographer is notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.