Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Carlos Botero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arguments all around voice concern with fully embracing either keep or delete. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Carlos Botero

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. The subject was head of an organization of marginal notability (World Justice Project). This does not mean that the person is notable independent of that organization. The page was created by employees of the organization a long time ago. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Thenightaway (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Colombia. Shellwood (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I'm not convinced their citation count or being Director of Instituto de Ciencia Politic is enough to pass WP:NPROF. Being former exec director of an organisation isn't enough to show notability either. Maybe could pass on WP:NAUTHOR for being a co-author if some significant reviews are found, as WJP Rule of Law Index is at least referred to in various independant sources. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep He has held multiple national and international offices which are enough to pass WP:NPOLITICIAN. Chagropango (talk) 11:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

. The positions that he held do not appear the kinds of 'offices' that the WP:NPOLITICIAN talks about. These positions are not purely run of the mill bureaucrats, but they seem to be the upper echelon of run of the mill bureaucrats. Thenightaway (talk) 11:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can one tell what positions are intended by WP:NPOLITICIAN? All that is specified is national or international offices. Chagropango (talk) 04:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (weakly...) - Meets WP:NPOLITICIAN, by a small margin. Thparkth (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.