Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joost van den Broek
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. This is a soft delete, and the article may be restored by a request at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Joost van den Broek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unsourced BLP The Banner talk 20:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Does that equate to being non-notable? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Not necessarily but not impossible (Dutch article was removed in 2007 for not being notable enough.). My first concern is the breach of WP:BLP. The Banner talk 11:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Delete Insufficient claim of notability per WP:Notability (music) and no sources as required by WP:BLP. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 15:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, possibly meets WP:MUSIC criteria #6 due to being a member of After Forever and maybe ReVamp. However, the article is completely unsourced and should be stubbed right down if references cannot be found. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC).
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 13:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.