Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Test (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, snowball keep bad faith nom (again) (Non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Test

The article does not have any reliable sources or references AltecCrog (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep The article needs better references, but a TV show on a national-level cable network is notable enough for an article. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bad faith nomination as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Test. Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Even if first nomination was in good fath, this one appears extremely WP:POINTy. Alansohn (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized the first nom was earlier today. That is ridiculous. Obviously you did not get the message the first time. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to make a comment and somehow THAT COUNTS AS EDITING OTHERS COMMENTS.THAT COMMENT WAS MY COMMENT.Sorry for being rude but do we really need to resort to such little changes being an offence? AltecCrog (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not getting it, are you? Your contribution history shows that you removed my comments twice, after I pointed out your reasoning of "the show sucks". Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.