Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cena discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

one album released, over a decade ago, and a combined total of three "guest appearances", this trivial information would all easily be summarised on John Cena's own page. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: it's already mostly summarized at John Cena#Music, albeit for the lack of charting positions of the album, some minor additions to that section of his main article could easily incorperate the non-included parts that currently stand on the AfD'd article. Azealia911 _talk 13:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to John Cena. No need for a separate article for such a tiny discography -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unnecessary CONTENTFORK from John Cena#Music, stand-alone article unwarranted after the release of one album. There's nothing to merge here, since there is also an article on the album. Kraxler (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as John_Cena#Music contains more information on his musical career than what is contained here. His discography isn't significant or notable enough for a separate article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.