Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jevon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was revert to the previous article about the given name. This would be a "delete" close if this article had been created on a separate page, but as it is no pages actually need to be deleted. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 23:55, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jevon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is unsourced biography made after July 2010, kinda, the entire page was hijacked from a disamb with people with Jevon to the artist currently on the page in Sept 1 2012 by Seminarmusicgroup. While I've noted the user about the COI and the Username matter, I still could not find any reliable source for this artist to meet WP:NOTE or on musicians. If this AFD passes, I would suggest reverting to the disamb of Jevon as noted in the history or moving that content to its own page and making a redirect. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC
- Note: As this article over-wrote an existing long-standing Name page, I have reverted to that previous content pending the discussion. The version of the "Jevon" page under discussion is this one. This may be a bit WP:IAR, but the (COI?) editor who added the material about the rapper destroyed the existing page to do so, and I don't think that information should be lost while this discussion proceeds. PamD 16:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Very well, its probably for the best, I wanted to follow the procedure to ensure it wouldn't step on any toes in case the editor became active and tried to defend it. Guess a close is in order, because this AFD is irrelevant, withdrawal is the only sane option in light of the revert. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's reasonable to discuss the deletion of "Article about rapper Jevon", even while it's not the visible version of the article. PamD 06:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I haven't found any reliable third-party sources to establish notability despite that I have added "Friday", "Seminar Music Group" and "recording artist" to my Jevon search. Not notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete concur with nominator & SwisterTwister. Jason from nyc (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep reverted version - As per PamD, the original disambiguation page was valid. Now that it has been restored, this AfD nom no longer has a reason for being. I've left a {{uw-coi-username}} warning on the talk page of Seminarmusicgroup and they should get banned for WP:CORPNAME. --Drm310 (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.