Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerod Morris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 23:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jerod Morris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of sustained coverage. Some coverage exists for a controversy involving Raúl Ibañez but that is WP:BIO1E at best. Let'srun (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indiana. Let'srun (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning toward Delete, but does two pages of this book equal "sustained coverage"? (p. 66-67). -- Jaireeodell (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Maybe that blog is more notable but not sure. Azuredivay (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.