Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Royle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Royle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was basically nearly all based on the person's personal linkedin account and twitter account. No sufficient evidence of notable. Was an outing issue aswell. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article being deleted???? I don't get it. This was all the evidence and information I could find about her. Where else could I find more about her? This is not fair, I'm just trying to contribute with the page and not doing anything wrong. Her info was even on her personal Facebook account and now you're telling me that's no sufficient evidence?? Explain please? www.facebook.com/jennifer.royle User:Ceedub88 16:44, 21 September 2017

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 17:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 17:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 17:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the article is based on three reliable sources, the first of which starts as "Jen Royle is an Emmy winning sports reporter ..."--Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above. She may not be a high-profile figure now, but she was at one time. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep same per the above.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only reliable sources so far are related to Boston. That shows the subject is not notable. Three sources is too little. It will remain a stub or will be deleted. QuackGuru (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying Boston sources are unreliable? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - They are reliable. Just three is not notable enough. QuackGuru (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.