Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Turner (Musician)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The High Learys . (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Jamie Turner (Musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See Draft:Jamie Turner (musician). FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 14:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to The High Learys unless/until significant coverage in independent reliable sources are found to justify a standalone article. Current article has no justification for any claim to independent notability, redirect is appropriate per WP:BAND.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to his band. Lacks independent notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect per above, not notable outside of the band where no sources establish his specific notability. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.