Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Weary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Canley (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete bit part teen actor sourced to imdb & myspace, nn fails WP:N & WP:BIO Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, myspace and imdb are not reliable sources. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, actor who portrayed a significant character in a core family on a significant soap opera. Not a bit part at all. Corvus cornixtalk 23:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all -- this article is insignificant and trivial. It should not be in an encyclopedia. There are no credible sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.3.125 (talk) 06:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - trivial media coverage and sources such as TV.com or IMDB aren't reliable. Addhoc (talk) 17:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not so trivial. If the character has a large wikipedia entry, likely the actor who plays him should have an entry too. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 23:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - A quick look around Google revealed plenty of sources that establish the subject as notable, with entries on TV.com, Soap Opera Digest, AOL video/CBS, Daytime Emmy Awards interview and many more. The Transhumanist 07:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tv. com isn't reliable Secret account 21:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Discussion reopened; closing statement by non-admin closer added as opinion. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 14:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as the references provided in Jake_Weary#References and in the comment by The Transhumanist above provide evidence of sufficient coverage in third-party reliable sources as to establish a presumption of Jake Weary's notability per the general notability guideline. Such a presumption, being established through objective evidence, outweighs the subjective assertions of non-notability presented by editors supporting the deletion of this article. John254 14:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, John254 16:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Keep, though the article needs to be fleshed out. There is more notable information about him, including the controversy that occurred when he left his role. And more detail is needed about his music career. (Will try to add these items myself). NickBurns (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.