Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahangir Khan Jani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 04:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jahangir Khan Jani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason the page should be deleted Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown: Speedy-delete-tagged for "created by banned user", but others have worked on it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't think this is a very good reason to delete this page. It might have been created by a user who got banned after creating it and then created socks afterwards to keep editing but this page was also worked by me and I added many sources to it. Those sources established his notability. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 09:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's nothing to actually suggest convincing independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 02:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep': Not sure if we have to vote with every relist or once is enough. I don't think this is a very good reason to delete this page. It might have been created by a user who got banned after creating it and then created socks afterwards to keep editing but this page was also worked by me and I added many sources to it. Those sources established his notability. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 02:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment only one vote is allowed, extra comments are ok.Atlantic306 (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree that he has a solid body of work with many prominent roles and the article is well referenced to the India national press such as Express Tribune. passes WP:BASIC. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.