Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. D. Ponit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J. D. Ponit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Opting for AFD as I can only machine-translate Hindi sources, however, both such searches and ones in English yield little in the way of significant coverage that suggests passage of WP:BIO or WP:GNG. SITH (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very little I could find on the subject or his "Orange Hindu Religious Organization". Probably why the article has no references. Britishfinance (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Briefly mentioned in The Difficult Flowering of Surinam: Ethnicity and Politics in a Plural Society [1], which also gives the Dutch name of the organization as well as information about its transition to a minor political party with a different name, about which more sources, though minor, can be found [2]. Supposedly it is covered in Mitrasing's The Border-conflict Between Surinam and Guiana, which I cannot access. Also, there is brief discussion of Ponit in Tien jaar Suriname, van afhankelijkheid tot gelijkgerechtigheid [3]. I don't think there's enough to merit a standalone article on this subject, but the field remains open for someone to create a properly-sourced article (or, more likely, a section in some other article) on the party/movement. Bakazaka (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination and commentary by Bakazaka, as above. -The Gnome (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.