Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invertika
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Invertika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD of "Still no verification and no assertion of notability, so should be removed (WP:V, WP:N)" with "removing the stranges boxes at top". Does not pass WP:GNG; cannot find any secondary, non-trivial, reliable sources to establish notability. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with nom. I also looked through the various Google searches and turned up nothing. There appear to be no reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Msnicki (talk) 14:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The game is apparently a non-notable fork of the marginally notable game The Mana World. I couldn't find a single reliable source, so I'm going with delete over redirect/merge. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable 3rd party publications; created by an SPA, so possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 12:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.