Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intense Method

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rhythm D. Redirecting, although the target seems to be headed for AfD, too. If that is deleted, this one should be deleted, too, judging from the comments of the editors participating in this debate. Randykitty (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intense Method

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSBIO -- notability claim seems to be that a song appeared on a popular soundtrack album. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rhythum D (the second option was to delete) as the one charting would be the only thing saving this and my searches found no better sourcing. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, or possibly even delete both articles. I could not find significant coverage of either in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.