Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inajira
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Um. A bit dificult to redirect this with no source. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Inajira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - I'm more than willing to create a List of Ravenloft characters to merge this to, if that sounds reasonable. BOZ (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per BOZ; this definitely isn't notable on its own, but we could gather up all articles like this and combine them into a list with some sources. —Torchiest talkedits 22:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge. Certainly not notable on its own. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.