Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilaya Nila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nominator's assertion that no sources existed has been refuted. Article needs sourcing, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 14:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ilaya Nila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significantly lacks sources, which are not available online. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and English through WP:INDAFD: Ilaya Nila

Comment: Apparently sources are available online. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Livemint and The Hindu call the song a classic and evergreen hit respectively. There are other sources ([1][2][3][4]). The rationale given by the nominator is lack of online sources but it seems like WP:BEFORE wasn't done.--Skr15081997 (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the various sources listed in the discussion. Many valid sources do in fact exist online. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.