Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idaho Freedom Caucus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Idaho Republican Party. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Idaho Freedom Caucus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. All coverage I can find is either routine and trivial. The best article available is this short routine AP piece about starting it. Most other coverage focuses on members of the caucus with trivial namedrops. WP:ORGTRIV applies here. C F A 💬 17:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Idaho. C F A 💬 17:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete created by User:IdahoPolitics a sock puppet of User:Tyler Ricks fails WP:NORG. Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable. Axad12 (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:ATD is a redirect or selective merge to Idaho Republican Party#History. Curbon7 (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Idaho Republican Party. Not implausible search term, sourcing exists over a number of years (cannot see why the 2023 Idaho Statesman source in the article is not relevant), but separate page seems unnecessary. Simple news searches reveal reliable sourcing: August 2023 (Idaho Freedom Caucus asked hospitals for abortion records) and May 2024 (Secret recording shows how a right-wing Idaho lobbyist tried to keep a legislator in lockstep). None of these items are trivial or routine. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Idaho Republican Party per @Goldsztajn OhHaiMark (talk) 10:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.