Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian MacDonald (architect)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ian MacDonald (architect)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ian MacArthur is not a notable architect. The article also reads like an advertisement or an “About Us” section on a company website.

Note: thecanadianencyclopedia.com is listed as an external link, but the website is offline. Did they shut down? After changing it to .ca, it gives me a 404, so the external link either rotted or was incorrectly typed then taken down by the Canadian Encyclopedia. BenzoAid (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to report: Not yet! (Next up: Better sources through WP:Library or otherwise.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Architecture. BenzoAid (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment doesn’t a record of winning awards for being you in your field demonstrate that you are not just a run of the mill architect? How many others have such a record? Mccapra (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability is demonstrated by the Canadian Encyclopedia article at https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/ian-macdonald Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, the Canadian Encyclopedia is online, my internet connection just sucked in that few minutes I tried checking the website. // 💪Benzo💪 (Send me a message!) (Here's what I've contributed.) 08:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain and the sources they provided. Subject seems notable enough to pass GNG. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.