Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Love the World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC(talk) 14:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Love the World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

made on behalf of 2603:8001:4542:28FB:64C1:4968:5AAA:4086/64 (see wikipedia:help desk#I Love the World); no comments on the merit of the request. this is their rationale:

The current sources for this article utterly fail GNG:

  1. the first is a press release and therefore non-independent;
  2. the second and third don't relate to the commercial at all;
  3. the fourth is a self-published YouTube video and is thus non-independent;
  4. the fifth is an entry in a database which provides no critical analysis whatsoever, and also has been dead for six years; and
  5. the sixth is a primary source.

I did some looking online but failed to find any reliable, independent, non-blog articles actually discussing this in-depth. Yes, there's an xkcd comic referencing this, but any sources for that will be focused on the comic as opposed to the commercial. The article also mentions that it won the silver award at the London International Awards, so maybe it could in theory meet WP:WEBCRIT#2, but I also couldn't find any reliable, independent, non-blog sources mentioning that either--and given how much the London International Awards article smacks of promotion (it had over 25 references to its own website or to press releases, not including inline external links, before I cut them out), I'm not exactly sure that's even the "world's leading award show" it claims to be (because hey, I could find barely any sources about that awards show either!).

ltbdl (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.