Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMISSU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to San Holo. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 00:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMISSU

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable song. WP:N is not happy. "A song exist and has views on youtube" generally does not warrant an article. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not seeing any notability, no charting, no WP:RS (actually, no references at all.) Main claim to fame is having a 7–figure viewership.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The song is not notable nor is it covered in any reliable sources. Youtube views doesn't cut it. Meatsgains (talk) 01:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect non-notable song to artiste.TheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect non-notable song to San Holo via {{R from song}}. - HyperGaruda (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.