Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housewitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Housewitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear notable per WP:N. Article is an orphan and a stub. Ahecht (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:NOTABILITY, has only one reference. APerson241 (talk!) 19:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that this is notable, but being an orphan and a stub and having only one reference are certainly not valid reasons for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found [1] and [2] which is signficant coverage, but this looks like a news item with no lasting impact. -- Whpq (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.