Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homebrew Channel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability established by significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, making it clearly pass WP:N. I suggest the nominator to read WP:BEFORE before nominating an article for deletion again. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Homebrew Channel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire article is referenced by wikis and blogs. Fails WP:NOTABLE Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 13:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There don't seem to be any reputable sources at all in this article. --Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Reliable sources found: Kotaku, Lifehacker, About.com (not sure about the RS status of the latter one). Salvidrim!

Some more: 1up, Joystiq, Engadget. Salvidrim! 19:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Salvidrim's sources. (Kotaku, 1up, Joystiq, and Engadget) Sergecross73 msg me 01:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Add Gizmodo and another about.com to those. Someone another 17:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.