Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexagon Crown Champion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hexagon Crown Champion

Article is purely original research. No sources are cited and if any are actually out there, I would be astounded. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If there were sources, I'm sure they'd be online. None are, so this looks good for deletion. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems like original research. Two google searches [1] and [2] don't turn up any reliable sources. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pure OR, is part of the guff that some try to add to Grand Slam champion or Triple Crown champion. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Conjecture and original research. Also, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ←Spidern → 17:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No such accomplishment exists and has ever been mentioned. A Google search of "Hexagon Crown Champion" (meaning those three words together in that order) only brought up 1 result, and that was its Wikipedia article. TJ Spyke 19:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't exist. I can't think of a speedy deletion criterion that applies, but there must be one. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for not existing, which hurts its chances of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If WWE does not recognize a Hexagon Crown Champion, then this article does not merit inclusion on the Wiki. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 05:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pure OR. This doesn't exist. Nikki♥311 23:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pure nonsense and WP:OR.--TRUCO ⁵⁰³ 21:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.