Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Roumieu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  16:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Roumieu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub on a Canadian illustrator whose illustrations appears frequently in the big name publications: Atlantic, New York Times etc. However there is next to nothing written about him in secondary sources. I suggest that perhaps he does not meet WP:GNG. New Media Theorist (talk) 22:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, have updated his article with some reviews of books that he has illustrated/written and that he has won at least two silver Canadian national magazine awards. So, he may now be notable? This page [3] shows that he has won numerous other awards, whether they are seen as significant I leave for other editors to decide (where are the Canadian editors to support this guy???)Coolabahapple (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 23:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Based on the reliable sources provided above about him, as well as [4], I think they add up to significant coverage, per WP:GNG, as well as the Canadian National Magazine Awards. Although I admit I'm not sure how long this article can be, since none of them are in great depth. mikeman67 (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.