Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Dolidze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 08:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgi_Dolidze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient reliable, independent and secondary source coverage. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. In Georgia, he is known as Gogi Dolidze, "Gogi" being a hypocorism for "George". As a Georgia native, I can say he is definitely famous in Georgia, but it was really hard to find any reliable English-language sources beyond a government website, mentioning a festival in his honor attended by high-ranking guests, and a local label, which has released his posthumous album.--Kober^Talk 02:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in Georgian or Russian are perfectly acceptable if you can find any. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be the spelling in Cyrillic: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Beautiful though the Georgian script may be, I'm afraid I don't have the competence to work out what the spelling would be in that. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.