Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geraldine Coutts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Radio Australia. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geraldine Coutts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:JOURNALIST. The sources merely confirm she has conducted interviews and are not significant coverage of her as the subject. LibStar (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Radio, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that the article fails WP:BIO. As per nom, there is no significant independent coverage. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 00:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The two comments above get it right. This article fails to qualify on all counts and should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Delete~~, I've tagged the article for a speedy delete as it makes no claim to notability at all. TarnishedPath^talk 11:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)~~ as per nomination, not notable. Interviewing notable people doesn't make someone notable in and of themselves. TarnishedPath^talk 10:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted that. What speedy deletion criteria deals with notability? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A7 - No indication of importance. Your reason for reversion was rational though. TarnishedPath^talk 23:30, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That policy has stated "This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability" (and has done for at least ten years). So no, it doesn't deal with notability, and I would advise you to read up on policy before participating in further debates. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Radio Australia per WP:ATD-R. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Radio Australia - this is a valid alternative to deletion.— MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Ritchie333, MaxnaCarta. Cabrils (talk) 00:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.