Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George M Daniel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 01:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- George M Daniel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Eliminate the middle initial and add fly fishing to the Google News terms, and ample references from reliable sources are found. One good example: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 14, 2007, "Daniel national fly-fishing champ". There are many more, which document that he is an international competitor as well. Cullen328 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - He is covered as the primary subject in multiple articles: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article, and Denver Post article. Google News shows a lot more but these 3 are sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - References demonstrate that he passes WP:GNG. Kugao (talk) 18:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've expanded the article, which now has five references. Thanks to Kugao for finding more references. If the closing administrator agrees to keep the article, I will move it to "George M. Daniel" with a period after the middle initial. I will also place a disambiguation hat note on George Daniel, the lacrosse official. Cullen328 (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.