Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geographic Baz Ashhab (Book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic Baz Ashhab (Book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is a downright copypaste from a Google-translated ar:جغرافية الباز الأشهب (كتاب), even including the templates. I'd say WP:TNT this incomprehensible monstrosity and let it be recreated by someone actually fluent in Arabic, if someone's interested - HyperGaruda (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per WP:TNT. The page is unreadable. OtterAM (talk) 20:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The article is useless since it is indeed unreadable. It is incomprehensible. I don't see how it could be rehabilitated from its current form. It has quite a few red links which means that no help could be had from related articles. Its length would add to the difficulty of rewriting it. I agree with the nominator and other commenters. Donner60 (talk) 04:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.