Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game People
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 16:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Game People (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not believe this article meets Notability standards. The article overall reads like an ad for the website. As well, I noticed someone in the article, User:Paulgovan, wrote up the article, which is a clear conflict of interest. GamerPro64 03:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as above, most of the references are no longer accessible, very superficial references, or references to the Game People site itself. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) All hits were passing mentions, and no other major coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 08:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 08:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of notability. Looks like it mostly exists to be an advertisement. ZettaComposer (talk) 13:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree with the previous three editor's points. Rockypedia (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches found nothing noticeably better and the current article is still questionable for notability at best. SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.