Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabbie Hanna unnamed debut album (GH1)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbie Hanna unnamed debut album (GH1)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:NALBUM (WP:FUTUREALBUM in particular); obvious case of WP:CRYSTAL. Throast (talk) 10:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Throast (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I can see why the WP:FUTUREALBUM applies, but not so much the WP:CRYSTAL, in that I'm not "predicting" or making any assumptions, the album is effectively slated for release in 2021 and the singer has already released 2 singles. Yes, it is still unnamed and has no official date, which is why the WP:FUTUREALBUM applies, but I wouldn't say I'm predicting this album when the singer herself has announced it.

Regardless, I'm happy to discuss it cause I do wanna learn how to navigate this site!!Charlotte 92 emma (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CRYSTAL, articles about anticipated events are appropriate if they are verifiable and the subject matter is of sufficiently wide interest, i.e. significant coverage by reliable sources. Here, coverage is far from significant. Throast (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there is simply not enough coverage to meet GNG, and of course no chart listing to help show that via an alternative method. OhioShmyo (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:HAMMER. Wait until it at least has a name. Not worth a redirect considering the awkward and uncommon naming conventions used - not likely to be searched for under this article title. Sergecross73 msg me 13:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the album had a name right now, it wouldn't pass notability standards. I feel like this needs to be clarified because editors shouldn't take away from this that, as soon as the album gets a name while coverage remains insufficient, they can go ahead and recreate the article. Throast (talk) 15:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. It also fails the WP:GNG, and needs to pass it before an article should be made. Sergecross73 msg me 01:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the policy-based reasons given by voters above. The fact that the singer is planning an album sometime in the near future can be mentioned at her main article for now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Easily fails WP:FUTUREALBUM with no confirmed name, track listing and release date. Since it's still planned, it's definitely way WP:TOOSOON. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 00:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above comments. I agree that it is WP:TOOSOON and does not meet the WP:FUTUREALBUM requirements. Aoba47 (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.