Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Francois (artist)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MER-C 04:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Fiona Francois (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. The1337gamer (talk) 07:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 07:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 07:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any coverage in independent, reliable sources. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST Mduvekot (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- 'Delete A thorough search did not result in any reliable sources or proof of notability. Netherzone (talk) 00:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- delete possible self promotional. No third party coverage provided me LibStar (talk) 23:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.