Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploit Submission Wizard
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Exploit Submission Wizard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability appears to be lacking in this unreferenced article. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article screams advertisement. Does not seem notable. I found it difficult to impossible to find any reliable sources via google that were not download links. --Millbrooky (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Key issues are WP:N and WP:RS. As stated 1,000 of ghits to download sites. But is this notable software? If so why? I cannot answer that. Article's content is nearly identical to the company website, maybe even a WP:COPYVIO. Created by an anonymous account and the software version number has never been updated. Does this software even work with modern systems? Un-sourced statements like "The Submission Wizard was the very first automated search engine submission tool, released in 1995 ..." need to be sourced or removed if the article isn't deleted. --Faradayplank (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.