Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etherlords
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 01:03, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Besides it's blatant promotional tone "You must simply have this game." It's not very informative. 66.50.97.114 03:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable game. Kappa 03:34, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, major game published several years ago. If the topic is encyclopedic but the article sucks, the solution is a cleanup tag, not nominating for deletion. Nandesuka 03:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. just clean up and take away POV, I'm not sure who's going to do that, but it seems the thing to say when an article is article worthy, just a mess. →ubεr nεmo→ lóquï 03:45, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as advertising/promotion. If someone edits out the POV and offers a more complete explanation of the rules and goals, I might change my vote to keep. Hamster Sandwich 03:53, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a clean up/attention candidate.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 09:12:28, 2005-08-09 (UTC)
- keep it must be ok if they've made a sequel. --Tim Pope 21:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It was pretty popular at the time. Article needs work though.--Apyule 05:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep published, successful video games. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 17:14, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.