Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential Mixes (Kylie Minogue album)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Kylie Minogue albums discography. Courcelles 05:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Essential Mixes (Kylie Minogue album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article about a remix album should be deleted as non-notable due to a lack of significant coverage in third-party sources. Unless sources are brought forward, we should not have an article on this topic. Till 04:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dl2000 (talk) 04:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge to Kylie Minogue albums discography. I couldn't find much coverage, but there is a review at Allmusic. It's encyclopedic content, so should either be kept or merged to the discography article. --Michig (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That is one source. WP:GNG expects more than one source for a topic to satisfy notability. Till 11:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - encyclopedic album. Subtropical-man (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And what policy states that if a topic is encyclopedic we must have an article on it, despite a lack of coverage in multiple reliable sources? Till 10:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is not enough sources, you can find the new sources and add to the article. Subtropical-man (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find sources, that's why we're here—because of a lack of sources outside the article. Till 01:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is not enough sources, you can find the new sources and add to the article. Subtropical-man (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And what policy states that if a topic is encyclopedic we must have an article on it, despite a lack of coverage in multiple reliable sources? Till 10:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apart that no other sources are present, the album didn't even chart and fails WP:NMG#Albums. — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to discography article - that way a reader looking for it will at least end up somewhere useful - David Gerard (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.