Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Ethiopia, Ottawa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect as mentioned and there's no noticeable need for any further comments (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Ethiopia, Ottawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. I originally prodded this article and it went 7 days unchallenged. it was deleted, and then the admin decided to restore this with the rationale that there exists other embassies within a template. I questioned this and others have been deleted to. the discussion with the admin is here, however they have not responded to my questions to explain how the rationale to restore a deleted article is flawed. so now I'm at AfD LibStar (talk) 06:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 10:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Embassies can certainly qualify for Wikipedia articles if they can be well-sourced over WP:GNG and/or WP:ORG — but they don't get an automatic entitlement to keep a poorly sourced or unsourced article just because they exist. Redirect to Canada–Ethiopia relations, a logical place for a topic of this type to be discussed if it hasn't earned a standalone article of its own. Bearcat (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.