Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elementary OS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 06:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elementary OS

Hasn't received any media coverage, distro still under construction. Non-notable. —Magic.Wiki (talk) 18:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is other software on Wikipedia that has not been released, and you can get it just not in a single installer. --Spazturtle (talk) 18:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at Talk:Elementary OS. —Magic.Wiki (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, so a good article can't be made. Maybe after it's released and generates buzz it can be recreated. Ancemy (talk) 23:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep www.distrowatch.com have added it to the list of distros to be added --Spazturtle (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They add every distro that announces itself (read their FAQ), but all distributions aren't notable. What I fail to find are reviews of this distribution in notable magazines and websites, not surprising as the distro is under construction. —Magic.Wiki (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to list of ubuntu-based distros - Improve the article or it will get deleted. Give me a reason why this is notable in any way (I don't care about wikilaw, just explain why this is not "just another distro") and I might change my vote. SF007 (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This distro uses a new custom kernal and nautilus navigation system, version 2.0 will have a custom GUI as well. Oh and distros like 'Super' Ubuntu are also "just another distro" --Spazturtle (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not said this was "just another distro", I just asked for a reason to keep. I don't like to delete articles, so I voted neutral. I would like to vote "weak keep", but the article is very small and the distro does not have much references. Anyway, I changed my vote to redirect, because I don't like deletions. Regarding Super Ubuntu, probably it is not much better than Ubuntu, I agree, but at least is a bit more useful than "pure Ubuntu". In case you did not noticed, I am not against the article (or the distro), au contraire... SF007 (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable and I found no third party reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 23:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. --Chealer (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.