Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eight Months on Ghazzah Street
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. joe deckertalk to me 15:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Eight Months on Ghazzah Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability per WP:N. Cs32en Talk to me 12:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is a novel by Man Booker Prize recipient Hilary Mantel. It may not be her most "notable" novel (see list here), but it is not entirely obscure either, and in my view it only serves WP's basic interests as an online encyclopedia to have an article on it. I do not see grounds, under WP:N, to remove it. What specific requirements would have to be met by the article in order for the deletion-nominator to agree to keep it? WikiDao ☯ 18:16, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Specifically, the article needs several reliable sources that report on the book (not the author) in a non-trivial way, as described by WP:N. Cs32en Talk to me 18:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per ample enough coverage (ie. reviews) found in GNews, some of which has been added to the article since the deletion nomination. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Book reviews are the sources hat show notability of a book. The nominator should have looked first, before placing this AfD . DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.