Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Wenzel-Halls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draft. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Wenzel-Halls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An editor dePRODed, he said the player plays in A-league, but there is no evidence that he has an appearance, so still WP:NFOOTBALL Hhkohh (talk) 10:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:36, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He is just transferred to A-League team (Brisbane) in this May. Meanwhile 2018-19 A-League will start in October 2018. So in my opinion, surely now he has not fulfilled NFOOTBALL. This article creation might be premature, better to create it after he plays a debut for Brisbane.--Fathul.mahdariza (talk) 13:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify He might pass WP:GNG already as apparently he was a sensation at the second tier, and the signing by Brisbane Roar seems to be a full contract, not merely a trial. I've seen a few such articles moved to draft space or even kept outright when it seems likely the player will play at fully professional level within a few months. I added citations to the article, and there are plenty more sources. Tell me what you think. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Just a bit WP:TOOSOON for WP:NFOOTBALL. Draftify is proper due to the high likelihood of his satisfying notability guidelines in the near future. SportingFlyer talk 08:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Currently doesn't fulfull WP:NFOOTY but will most likely make an appearance in the fully-pro A-League in the upcoming season. --SuperJew (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Doesn't satisfy WP:NFOOTY, but probably will soon.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - There is no guarantee he will ever play for Brisbane Roar. Simione001 (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- My thinking is that it would be effectively in probation for six months as a draft, and will be speedy deleted as a matter of course if no edits in that time. If Wenzel-Hall gets a game within the first couple of months of 2018-19 season, it will be a "keep" under WP:NFOOTY (and I expect WP:GNG because he seems to be a media favorite); if he stays in reserves or on the bench, it will be a "delete" unless the draft creator can make a good GNG case. Jack N. Stock (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.