Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down Gilead Lane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Down Gilead Lane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

obscure radio drama fails WP:GNG. Plenty of sites host links to episodes but no substantial coverage found. Tagged {{notability}} in January 2009 with no progress made. The Dissident Aggressor 20:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As written, this relies entirely on primary sources for referencing, with not a shred of reliable source coverage provided to get it past WP:NMEDIA. And for added bonus, nearly all of the content is in-universe biographies of the characters, with virtually no real-world context. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be sourced properly. Note also List of Down Gilead Lane episodes; if this goes, that will have to go too. Bearcat (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more or less per Bearcat, I was unable to find sources which would establish notability, used the usual arrangement of Google searches plus a look via Highbeam. Also would support deletion of the episode list, same reasoning. --j⚛e decker ^talk 18:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.