Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dormitory Effect (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dormitory Effect (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried cleaning up this article but it looks like a lot of unverifiable material and original material. Sources were hard to find and archived sources didn't say much. The main assertions of notability are not really related to the band itself. Citing (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sources are either invalid (ie: no web link, book ISBN number, etc) or don't cover the band in significant enough coverage. The line about opening for Black Sabbath is textbook WP:GARAGE. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No major label, no significant chart position, no gold/platinum certifications, no significant sales, no awards, etc. Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO and fails WP:GNG. Яεñ99 (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.