Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devante Clut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Devante Clut

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the moment anyway - is signed with Brisbane Roar and on the roster, while I cannot find proof of his having been put into a game yet, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy and deleting this only to have to undelete/recreate a week or so later would just be silly. I'd suggest letting this one simmer per WP:IAR until the season is over or he is cut, at which point if he hasn't played we can round file it. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 14:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL; saying "he'll be notable in the future, honest!" violates WP:CRYSTAL. I am more than happy to be the admin who 'wastes' 12 or whatever of my precious seconds it'll take restoring the article if & when he becomes notable. GiantSnowman 16:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- IMHO, saying "he won't be notable anytime soon so delete" also violates WP:CRYSTAL. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nobody has actually said that - and that's not what CRYSTAL is about at all. Giant Snowman 08:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. JMHamo (talk) 09:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per GS, a potential case of WP:TOOSOON. Will be easy to recreate if he plays professionally. There is clear consensus at WP:FOOTY that players must already have played in an FPL or at senior international level to pass notability. There is no consensus on any form of period of grace. Fenix down (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails both relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.