Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Days In The Trees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to No-Man. 28bytes (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Days In The Trees

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:N/WP:GNG for musicians, performers, or for recorded works ColonelHenry (talk) 09:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I don't see this fitting WP:NALBUMS, but some of the information can be included on the main No-Man page. PaintedCarpet (talk) 15:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 23:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (or redirect) to the band's page. This release apparently entered the UK indie charts, but the most detail I could find in a reliable sources was a couple sentences in this book. Gong show 07:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.