Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Record
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 04:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- David Record (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promo piece for local rapper built by sockpuppets. He has recieved a little bit of local interest coverage but nothing significant. Album is independently released. No charting or gold (claims he's sold ~4,000 copies). No major awards. May have toured UK but I found no mention of it in the UK press. PR claims of over a 1,000,000 views on youtube seem fake, 520 seems to be the real figure. Airplay is not national and not rotation. Nothing satisfying WP:MUSIC. Improve Wikipedia by getting rid of spam, stop rewarding bad faith editng. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per all the reasons above. In addition the official web-site (refs now removed) had drive-by malicious code suggesting an even less attractive motive for the authors of this piece. Velella Velella Talk 09:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- If the official web site is still poison, please consider asking that it be WP:Blacklisted or globally blacklisted until the web site is cleaned up. Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.