Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lindley (palaeontologist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Lindley (palaeontologist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe palaeontologists aren't widely covered on the web, but apart from a couple of mentions in The Geological Society of Australia Inc newsletter about his research and a few items on google scholar, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of reliable sources to prove this guy's notability. Note that I'm pretty sure that he is not the co-author of the "Jurrasic Park, how to build a dinosaur" cloning book. The-Pope (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- The-Pope (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the absence of any evidence of scientific impact for his research or business impact for his company. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, highest cited (and possibly only) paper; 13. Abductive (reasoning) 19:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.