Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Thailand relations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Croatia–Thailand relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
another completely random combination. non resident embassies. 3 minor bilateral agreements. Close to no coverage except of relations on the football field and tennis court. [1] LibStar (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to relevant foreign relations articles. There's (just) enough to merge- a presidential visit but he visited most of Asia on the same trip. A merge is probably the best option- it doesn't need its own article. HJMitchell You rang? 00:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing, absolutely nothing, makes this article anything but a directory listing. There is no coverage of the topic, and not likely to be.--BlueSquadronRaven 17:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There appears to be a fair amount of coverage of Thailand's wish to establish a bilateral free trade area with Croatia in books, scholarly articles and the news (yes, there's lots of noise there but there is some signal). I'm not going to !vote keep, because I admit defeat in this war of attrition to get rid of articles about serious subjects that any comprehensive encyclopedia should cover. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources found above. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Google searches are not sources. LibStar (talk) 14:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Random X-Y intersection. There are thousands of bilateral agreements signed every year and yet, they do not establish encyclopedical notability. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the absence of any reliable sources that establish this is a notable relationship by discussing the relationship and its significance at all.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm just not seeing any sources that would establish that this topic meets WP:N. I spent a few minutes going through the results of Phil Bridger's searches, and I'm only seeing noise--nothing that discusses specifically the bilateral relations between Croatia and Thailand in a non-trivial manner. If someone can point out the signal above the noise and incorporate these sources into the article, then I'll reconsider, but for now I'm unconvinced of notability. Yilloslime TC 22:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.