Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conan vs. bear (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Conan O'Brien. I'll keep the merge request open for a week, then redirect this article if the merge issue hasn't been resolved till then. Any other requests, please direct to my talk page. Thanks. Wifione ^Message 04:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conan vs. bear

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD'ed before with "no consensus therefore keep" but as the years tick by it seems to continue to fail WP:WEBPAGE. See old AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conan vs. bear Ifnord (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - Has secondary not trivial coverage in multible reliable sources, such as Buffalo News, The Arizona Republic, St. Paul Pioneer Press, Bradenton Herald, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The nom lacks of WP:BEFORE. Cavarrone (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Conan O'Brien. A two sentence article? If the entire subject can be summed up so simply then merge into the reason theis subject has notability in the first place. --Falcadore (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Meh, its just a skit on a late night show. Sources support its mentino at the COnan article, not a standalone, permanent stub. Tarc (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 00:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge not worth an independent article. Brief mentions in a short time period in 2005. Nothing since. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge Two sentences? WTF? Wikipedia should not be a dumpster for every trivial tidbit that anyone ever found temporarily interesting. - Frankie1969 (talk) 02:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Où sont les fads d'antan? In any case, the real Conan is more than a match for any bear. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Or merge. Persistence is unlikely to be forthcoming here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.