Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Flaherty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 02:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Flaherty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't need a long, drawn-out discussion. This is an open and shut vanity article case. I tried to salvage it but, after removing all content that was cited by the subject's own website and blogs there is so little left to this entry that it doesn't seem to merit a place. BlueSalix (talk) 10:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 9. Snotbot t • c » 10:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom, self published author, no backup to any notabilty as a journalist or broadcaster.TheLongTone (talk) 11:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 16. Snotbot t • c » 04:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Self-publishing author, no significant coverage; "mentioned in passing" hardly qualifies as a ringing endorsement. Chick Bowen 04:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.