Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloughjordan Community Farm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cloughjordan Community Farm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable non-profit organisation. Doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV, WP:ORGDEPTH or related criteria. It is a community organisation which (according to its CRO returns for 2018) has 2 employees. In terms of coverage, the archived Farmers Journal piece in the article seems to be the only coverage in that outlet for which the subject is the primary topic. (There are others in which the subject is mentioned, but where the primary topic is another subject/event.) Elsewhere, for example in the Irish Times as the main newspaper of record in Ireland, I can find nothing at all for the literal string/subject's name. A broader search, for coverage in which the subject may be mentioned, returns just that: a handful of pieces in which the subject is mentioned in passing. This is just a largely ROTM community organisation/farm. There is no reason to consider it any more notable than any other community organisation. Or farm. Guliolopez (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not a notable farm. Spleodrach (talk) 11:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HOLE. Geschichte (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.